We define user defined exceptions by extending the Exception class. Why not by extending RunTimeException class. I tried it and it doesn't give any exceptions. Then why we don't do it.
Welcome to the Java Programming Forums
The professional, friendly Java community. 21,500 members and growing!
The Java Programming Forums are a community of Java programmers from all around the World. Our members have a wide range of skills and they all have one thing in common: A passion to learn and code Java. We invite beginner Java programmers right through to Java professionals to post here and share your knowledge. Become a part of the community, help others, expand your knowledge of Java and enjoy talking with like minded people. Registration is quick and best of all free. We look forward to meeting you.
>> REGISTER NOW TO START POSTING
Members have full access to the forums. Advertisements are removed for registered users.
We define user defined exceptions by extending the Exception class. Why not by extending RunTimeException class. I tried it and it doesn't give any exceptions. Then why we don't do it.
But you can do it if it makes sense.
Have a read of The Catch or Specify Requirement in Oracle's Tutorial. It describes checked exceptions, errors and runtime exceptions. They are different sorts of thing and you are free to extend whichever makes sense for the particular exceptional situation you wish to signal. (or use an instance of one of the already existing classes)