Welcome to the Java Programming Forums
The professional, friendly Java community. 21,500 members and growing!
The Java Programming Forums are a community of Java programmers from all around the World. Our members have a wide range of skills and they all have one thing in common: A passion to learn and code Java. We invite beginner Java programmers right through to Java professionals to post here and share your knowledge. Become a part of the community, help others, expand your knowledge of Java and enjoy talking with like minded people. Registration is quick and best of all free. We look forward to meeting you.
>> REGISTER NOW TO START POSTING
Members have full access to the forums. Advertisements are removed for registered users.
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Can we increase the stack size for JVM ?
Hello,
I am using a recursive function in my standalone java application which causes the stack over flow. So, I have increased the stack size to 2048k.
Is that fine to increase the stack size? If not can any one suggest me how to over the issue.
Thanks in advance,
Prasanna
Related threads:
Re: Can we increase the stack size for JVM ?
Post your code? It may be that there's something wrong with your recursive function.
Re: Can we increase the stack size for JVM ?
If you are getting a StackOverflowError your code is probably doing something wrong and most likely calling it self over and over again without breaking out of the pattern. This will require a change to the code not increase the JVM heap size.
However if you are receiving an OutOfMemoryError its because your program is trying to allocate more memory than the JVM has been given so a common solution to that problem is to increase the amount of heap size for the JVM.
// Json
Re: Can we increase the stack size for JVM ?
I think its in the recursive loop and never coming out of it .
Re: Can we increase the stack size for JVM ?
Thank you for all the suggestions. My code is very huge to post. I will look into the recursive function once again and try to find out the loop hole.
Thanks you once again,
Prasanna
Reply With Quote