Welcome to the Java Programming Forums


The professional, friendly Java community. 21,500 members and growing!


The Java Programming Forums are a community of Java programmers from all around the World. Our members have a wide range of skills and they all have one thing in common: A passion to learn and code Java. We invite beginner Java programmers right through to Java professionals to post here and share your knowledge. Become a part of the community, help others, expand your knowledge of Java and enjoy talking with like minded people. Registration is quick and best of all free. We look forward to meeting you.


>> REGISTER NOW TO START POSTING


Members have full access to the forums. Advertisements are removed for registered users.

Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: synchronized block

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default synchronized block

    The general form of synchronized block is
    class table 
    { 
    ....... 
    void printTable(int n) 
    { 
    synchronized(obj) 
    { 
    ...... 
    } 
    } 
    }
    Here obj means object of table class or object of any class.
    If we write this in place of obj ,then an object of table class can’t access the synchronized block from two different threads.
    MYDOUBTS:
    1)Is it possible to write name of object other than table class in place of obj?
    2)If write other object’s name other than table class in place of obj,what it means?
    3)Then which object can’t access the synchronized block simultaneously?


  2. #2
    Super Moderator Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Eastern Florida
    Posts
    25,140
    Thanks
    65
    Thanked 2,720 Times in 2,670 Posts

    Default Re: synchronized block

    Read the API doc of the Object class's wait() and notify() methods. A lot is explained there.
    If you don't understand my answer, don't ignore it, ask a question.

  3. #3
    Super Moderator jps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    2,642
    My Mood
    Daring
    Thanks
    90
    Thanked 263 Times in 232 Posts

    Default Re: synchronized block

    You can synchronize on any object.
    Check out this tutorial
    If you still have questions please ask again.

    in short:
    1. yes
    2. you can use any object for a lock
    3. when an object is locked, only the holder of the lock has access

Similar Threads

  1. Synchronized block in java
    By me_shankara in forum What's Wrong With My Code?
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: December 12th, 2012, 11:43 PM
  2. doubt on synchronized block-2
    By me_shankara in forum What's Wrong With My Code?
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: December 10th, 2012, 08:34 AM
  3. synchronized block
    By me_shankara in forum Threads
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: December 10th, 2012, 08:34 AM
  4. synchronized block in java
    By me_shankara in forum Threads
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: December 3rd, 2012, 11:04 PM
  5. Synchronized block vs Synchronized method
    By tcstcs in forum Java Theory & Questions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: April 20th, 2011, 07:51 AM