Thread: Error in constructor

Abstract1 is the default constructor in AbstractClass1.
Abstract1 looks exactly like the constuctor above in MyTimes
The error comes when I compile the MyTimes class, so to me the issue is with how I have my constructor build in MyTimes and the abstract to which it extends. The MyTimes constructor is after my class instance variables which must be "protected".
They are also identified as protected in my AbstractClass1.

Abstract1 is the default constructor in AbstractClass1.

You'll have to post some actual code. The names of constructor and class must match. Your comment makes no sense.

Heres the code from my abstract class.

public abstract class PhoneCall {

//Instance Variables of type CheckedTime
protected CheckedTime startTime;
protected CheckedTime endTime;

/*
A public constructor that accepts two CheckedTime objects,
one for the start time and one for the finish.
*/
public PhoneCall(CheckedTime startTime, CheckedTime endTime) {

this.startTime = startTime;
this.endTime = endTime;

} //end constructor method
}

Here's the code from my other class. There are more classes, but these are the ones causing the compile error.
public class LocalCall extends PhoneCall {

//Class variables
CheckedTime startTime;
CheckedTime endTime;

private double totalCallLength = 0;
private double totalCost = 0;

//Constants
static final double LOCAL_COST = .01;
static final int HUNDMIN_to_SEC = 6000;

//LocalCall constructor
public LocalCall(CheckedTime startTime, CheckedTime endTime) {

this.startTime = startTime;
this.endTime = endTime;

} //end constrctor

Your code does NOT call the super class's constructor, so the compiler wants to add a call to the default constructor which does not exist.
Either call the super constructor or add a default constructor.

The sub class's variable names are the same as the base class's variable names.
Do you intended to mask the base class variables?

No, I wanted to get access to them. I used super (variable1, variable2) and it compiled.

Is your problem solved now?

Yes sir, thank you